do you think this is fair?, about new rule Options

[ailwasp]

This is why we will restrict the activity a bit. This will happen in the following way:

Every user will be able to finish 50 games per day (involving tournament games, friendlies, union games, Championship games) without any restrictions. Starting with the 51st game, stadium income as well as player xp will be reduced percentage-wise. Only 2% of active users play more than 50 games per day. This is unfair towards the other 98%, which is why the limit will be implemented. This way, we can achieve fair play and equal chances for the majority of 98%.


i can garantee you that there ar more than 30% playing more than 50 games / day , also what about players who have their teams with lot of exp, how do you think that new players can catch them?

at lvl 8 in vip cups if you reach the finals and play in them you have 8 games so this leaves you to play in only 6 cups with full exp, than what`s the point of having a vip account? , and also there are players who play more than 10-20 friendlies /day , so again bac to vip cups if someone gets out of the first group he has to play 3 more games so it`s 6 , that`s still leaves the user to play in only 8 cups

i understand that you want fairness .,,or how do you say it but i personally think this is not so good (but it`s just an oppinion, and sorry for my bad english)

[schiphol]

hi,
i fully support fight against players who play 24hours a day.. so i welcome the attempt to do something,, but what was done is terrible.. i am not using bots, it is only me , who is playing, but i play more than 50 games almost every day..

i recommend to this:

after 50games you decrease the game exp, and stadium revenue to lets say 90% of full value.. then after next for example 30 games,, it will be 80%,, after next 30 games,, 70% and so on..

i think it is much more acceptable, if it is done gradually,, not just a jump from full exp to almost zero..

and it would harm players like me only a little.. but it would harm the real cheaters more

thanks for possible consideration of this