Today I saw a lack of fair play between two players who combined a result to enter into new round. one of them did not appear in the game and gave three points to the other.
in the future to avoid these situations, I think that if a player no-show, the player must lose three points.
best regards
Full Version: Fair Play
QUOTE(pantagruel @ Oct 6 2009, 06:58 PM) 
Today I saw a lack of fair play between two players who combined a result to enter into new round. one of them did not appear in the game and gave three points to the other.
in the future to avoid these situations, I think that if a player no-show, the player must lose three points.
best regards
I have seen this happen too and like you said it isn't fair play and I think you're right, the player should get points taken off for doing so.
You guys won't be saying this if you had got those points. I too do this so sometimes to recover stamina for final
At this point it is unlikely to change, but stay tuned for final answer...
QUOTE(abdul wahab @ Oct 6 2009, 08:12 PM)
You guys won't be saying this if you had got those points. I too do this so sometimes to recover stamina for final
Of course I wouldn't because I don't like to play like that, if I want to recover stamina I just sit out my best players and hope my bench can pull off the win.
It's all tactical and it's part of why I enjoy this fast paced game, just what is the point of having to wait 10 mins for a WO and waste everyone's time.
(kakashi197 @ Oct 7 2009, 04:33 AM)
Of course I wouldn't because I don't like to play like that, if I want to recover stamina I just sit out my best players and hope my bench can pull off the win.
It's all tactical and it's part of why I enjoy this fast paced game, just what is the point of having to wait 10 mins for a WO and waste everyone's time.
Kakashi,
I do the same. when I have enough points to pass, I put defensive tactic and rest the best players =)
(callzeke @ Oct 7 2009, 01:28 AM)
At this point it is unlikely to change, but stay tuned for final answer...
I'll stay tuned. I understand that it is difficult to change this rule, but the competition would be fairer
I don't think this is fair play, too, but at the moment there are no changes planned.
We discuss this situation with the developers, as we have some suggestions (i.e. to reduce the player experience 1 point, after a technical loss).
But the big problem is, that you never know, why somebody did not submit his scheme. I for myself am often in the situation that I play two games and doing something else too and forget to submit for the third game (also i often forget to submit for the first game
). Maybe the guys are also busy.
As I said, we are discussing this situation. More information will follow in the future.
We discuss this situation with the developers, as we have some suggestions (i.e. to reduce the player experience 1 point, after a technical loss).
But the big problem is, that you never know, why somebody did not submit his scheme. I for myself am often in the situation that I play two games and doing something else too and forget to submit for the third game (also i often forget to submit for the first game
). Maybe the guys are also busy.As I said, we are discussing this situation. More information will follow in the future.
QUOTE(faceman @ Oct 7 2009, 11:19 PM)
I don't think this is fair play, too, but at the moment there are no changes planned.
We discuss this situation with the developers, as we have some suggestions (i.e. to reduce the player experience 1 point, after a technical loss).
But the big problem is, that you never know, why somebody did not submit his scheme. I for myself am often in the situation that I play two games and doing something else too and forget to submit for the third game (also i often forget to submit for the first game
). Maybe the guys are also busy.As I said, we are discussing this situation. More information will follow in the future.
i agree. We never know why somebody did not submit his scheme, even though, this situation must have some fair solution. We must look in both side, player who don't submit and player which is get disadvantage for that. How about like friendly match, if there is a player not submit yet and the time is off, just automatically submitted with a default scheme.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.