Fair Play, tourments fair play Options

[pantagruel]

Today I saw a lack of fair play between two players who combined a result to enter into new round. one of them did not appear in the game and gave three points to the other.

in the future to avoid these situations, I think that if a player no-show, the player must lose three points.

best regards

[faceman]

I don't think this is fair play, too, but at the moment there are no changes planned.

We discuss this situation with the developers, as we have some suggestions (i.e. to reduce the player experience 1 point, after a technical loss).

But the big problem is, that you never know, why somebody did not submit his scheme. I for myself am often in the situation that I play two games and doing something else too and forget to submit for the third game (also i often forget to submit for the first game ). Maybe the guys are also busy.

As I said, we are discussing this situation. More information will follow in the future.

[kalelkva]

I don't think this is fair play, too, but at the moment there are no changes planned.

We discuss this situation with the developers, as we have some suggestions (i.e. to reduce the player experience 1 point, after a technical loss).

But the big problem is, that you never know, why somebody did not submit his scheme. I for myself am often in the situation that I play two games and doing something else too and forget to submit for the third game (also i often forget to submit for the first game ). Maybe the guys are also busy.

As I said, we are discussing this situation. More information will follow in the future.

i agree. We never know why somebody did not submit his scheme, even though, this situation must have some fair solution. We must look in both side, player who don't submit and player which is get disadvantage for that. How about like friendly match, if there is a player not submit yet and the time is off, just automatically submitted with a default scheme.